I'm familiar with most of this kit from photos and books, but never seen most of them in action.
Pretty neat!
Still, to this day, not one of my guns has murdered anyone. NFATCA delenda est!
I'm familiar with most of this kit from photos and books, but never seen most of them in action.
Pretty neat!
Once again:
The possession, use, or storage of Weapons or Firearms is strictly prohibited on all [Brown] University Property and at [Brown] University-sponsored events, except as authorized under this policy.
There cannot have been a mass shooting at Brown University because firearm possession, use and storage has been prohibited.
Do not repeat the lies of the mass media.
Or, maybe, just MAYBE, gun free victim zones are the problem and not the guns.
I don't recall any mass shootings since Texas legalized campus carry.
There's a faction of people who are wanting others to stop discriminating against them for their "immutable characteristics," but are more than happy to condemn "cisgender white men."
You know, discriminating against straight white guy's for their immutable characteristics.
I guess the best thing about being a liberal is getting twice as many standards as everyone else.
I dunno why people say opening a can with a P-38 is difficult. It only took me a moment.
I don't know what everyone complains about.
It appears that Dan Crenshaw is suing Shawn Ryan for asking how he got so wealthy on his congressional salary.
I find that I want to hear the answer to this question because I know several people who've been working for longer at a congressional pay scale and aren't millionaires.
Almost as if there's something congress creatures get to do that normal people don't.
I am not sure if it's Blogger or Flickr that's the problem with putting pictures on the blog.
The "by URL" inserter from the WYSIWYG interface barfs on anything bigger than x1024.
It will happily display a linked photo that's much larger if you write your own HTML string.
I am not sure if this is Flickr refusing to parse for the inserter, or the inserter being unable to process larger files before it times out.
Harvey decided she needed some time to herself so I decided to go for a drive.
Five hours later, I am home.
The Beast is just a nice cruiser.
Took some new roads and did some small exploring.
Florida between Crystal River and Chiefland is about as nothing to see as you can get.
Lots and lots of deer. Paid close attention to that with a foot hovering over the brake.
Modern Tactical Shooting gives us a bit of history.
No real surprises.
There's a truism about WW2; "The war was won with British intelligence, American steel and Russian blood." It's attributed to Stalin himself.
I became aware of this truism from some British subject explaining how us Americans didn't really do much and we shouldn't be saying we won the war.
They refer to WW1 in this light too.
Well, WW1 would probably have ended differently after the collapse of Russia and without the injection of American troops to the Western Front. Even if the Germans eventually lost, the surrender terms would likely have been a lot less provocative. Might even have prevented WW2 from happening at all.
But the "American steel" part misses something very important.
American FOOD.
If we'd sat it out completely, England would have starved. Literally.
I don't believe that the US won the war in Europe single-handedly. But I do think that the US was instrumental in achieving that victory.
On the topic of war I'm different from a lot of the people I'm reading.
I don't think one should wait until it's too late to start one, but I also don't think it should be the first step of "diplomacy."
I think that if we're going to have a war, we should to it right, follow the rules and have Congress pass a declaration of war.
I also think that the president should have the flexibility to reply to casus belli without waiting for Congress to convene and vote.
But I'm conflicted on the president being able to initiate hostilities.
"But, McThag," I hear some say, "what if a quick, surprise, attack is what's needed?"
I dunno. That's why I am conflicted.
Considering how often the people who are on the receiving end of those quick, surprise, attacks are not national actors, then I think the old hostis humani generis rules apply.
Wanna drop a JDAM on pirates, slavers or terrorists? That's executive power and doesn't need Congress to further authorize the force because it's long accepted that such are enemies of humanity.
I'm getting to the point of thinking that non-assimilating, illegal aliens should be added to the list.
It'd be a Hell of an incentive for them to get to be becoming 'Merican.
But if you want to make war on a nation-state, you have to get Congress involved before you start shooting if they aren't actually shooting at you first.
I get conflicted because I can easily see lots of practical problems with following the rules.
However, if war is declared, then WARRE it is!
You get us to the point where we feel the need to get that declaration, your nation becomes an entry in the history books. Your language, culture and history will be, effectively, erased and you will be replaced by US. Your nation becomes a territory. Your people become territorial residents who will now have to assimilate to being Americans; like it or not. Your grandchildren will not know how to speak your foreign tongue and will not be able conceive of a time where their home state was ever a nation-state.
I'd rather we were a lot friendlier and happier nation than that though. I prefer mutually beneficial treaties, trade and cultural exchange.
Wiping you off the face of the Earth is the last thing I want us to do... but it IS on the list.
Just sayin'.
Twilight:2000 happens as some long held paradigms in infantry weapons changed.
The Austrians and British had changed over to bullpup rifles which used magnified optics instead of iron sights. The Germans were working on a caseless bullpup rifle that used a scope instead of irons.
The US and Canada were slicing the carry handles off their M16 derivatives and replacing them with a rail which wasn't specific to a particular optic. The US with the, now, ubiquitous Picatinny rail, Canada going with a modification of the ancient Weaver system. Picatinny is also a modification of the Weaver system, but different from the Canadian version.
It's the slots. Weaver and Canada use narrower slots (0.180" vs 0.206"). Weaver doesn't specify spacing of the slots, Canada and Picatinny do.
Canada and Picatinny use different spacing (0.394" center to center for Picatinny) with the Canadian system getting 14 slots in the same space as Picatinny getting 13.
This creates some incompatibilities. Don't get too down on Canada here, they simply licensed an existing Weaver modification from A.R.M.S. mere months before the Picatinny rail was developed and NATO adopted it.
Anything designed for a Weaver base will fit both.
Anything designed for a Canadian rail will fit a Picatinny rail.
Some things designed for a Picatinny rail will fit on a Weaver or Canadian rail. Trial and error here.
And then there's the Soviets and Warsaw Pact...
Nominally there are two standard side-rails for their weapons. The AK pattern and the SVD pattern.
The same scope can be found with either mounting style. Except for the mounting, they are identical.
Later scopes, outside the scope (pun) of T2K have a mounting system that can used with both style of rails.
Dear YouTubers, especially GunTubers...
Tell me what you're going to say.
Say it.
Tell me what you just said.
Don't ramble on for 1/3 of the video with the justification for what you're about say.
Justfication comes after your statement, to support it, not before.
Take a couple classes on public speaking at the local community college!
Ilhan Omar thinks we should have Federal gun registration.
Yeah, right. Let's ignore that the number of firearms is increasing steadily and the rate of crime done with them is falling.
As Fuddbusters points out, let's say the, ever efficient, Feral Gubmint can register a gun a minute.
There's 637 to 985 million firearms out there to register!
At one a minute... 1,215.28 to 1,897.2 years.
This assumes 100% compliance, and even traditionally polite and law-abiding Canada can't get that!
We're also seeing the effects of giving up personal arms in places like Great Britain.
Compliance is gonna be low.
Even saying, "we're gonna register all the new guns and not worry about the almost a billion already out there!" adds 47.7 years of registration at one gun a minute every year for the 25 million guns added to the supply.
I think they can record and register the new guns a lot faster than one a minute.
It's possible to register all the new guns.
It's not possible to account for all the existing guns.
When a gun is damaged beyond repair, there's no requirement to tell anyone about it. Some simple precautions and it's in the scrap bin.
Ten years later, what gun?
The non-compliant will simply say they had the proverbial boating accident and without a search of their residence you don't know if they're lying. You can't know!
This also assumes they hid it IN their residence to be found during a search too.
I think your average clumsy boater is smart enough to cache their accidentally lost guns off site.
Home Depot sells everything you need to hide a gun for decades.
I have long held to the belief that if you intend to live someplace you should join the citizenry.
I did not move to Florida and subject them to my Iowa ways. I attempted to act like them not force them to act like me.
I remember why I left Iowa. Why would I want to bring that with me?
Admittedly, it's a smaller move to change from one region of the US to another, but it was a change.
Floridians chafe at New Yorker's constant bitching about how things are better in New Fucking York.
Explain, again, why the fuck you're here, again?
I mean if Florida sucks and you're unhappy here, why don't you just return to the land of good bagels and pizza?
They've forgotten why they left.
Yet, they're still Americans. Fellow citizens.
The problem is that people who aren't Americans are living here without a plan to become Americans.
This was not true of the other mass immigrations to the US.
The Swedes, Germans, Irish and Italians who came here and manifest destinied the shit out of The West were already most of the way to being Americans because there was, like, an 80% overlap between American and anyone from Western Civilization. Much of the gap was eliminated through learning English.
There were large enclaves of these immigrants where, if they didn't assimilate, they did not leave without harassment. Literal ghettos used to force assimilation.
My great grandfather and grandfather on Mom's side both experienced what would be called racism if we accepted Italian as being racist. My mother and I experienced no such prejudice. My grampa assimilated.
The present problem is Mexicans and South Americans are present in large enough numbers that their enclaves don't resemble ghettos but colonies. Somalians are definitely running a colonial model.
We're paying them to do it.
At least Latinos are from Western Civ, but their flavor has less overlap with American thanks to growing up under less than Western Civ governments. It wouldn't really take a strong effort to get them to assimilate.
Somalis aren't from Western Civ and would take a lot more effort to get them assimilate.
I'm not opposed to the effort, but any refusal to assimilation should be accompanied with a deportation.
Islam may, ultimately, be incompatible with Western Civ and being American.
American includes religious freedom that's anathema to Sharia.
Sharia and the Bill of Rights have a lot of conflict too.
Conflict that, if it proves irreconcilable, means they will not be assimilated and if they cannot or will not, need to find someplace else to live.
I am not the only person who marvels that not a single Moslem refugee population has taken refuge in an Islamic country.
I am increasingly convinced it is not emigration or refuge they seek, but conquest. Colonization.
They mean to subjugate The West.
I hope to fight it, being of The West, I have much to lose.
When women have 100% the choice about whether they get or stay pregnant, they don't get to claim any right to the father's money.
Their body, their choice.
They choose poorly, to Hell with them!
Enshrined in law is:
Both parents don't want a kid, kid can be aborted or given up for adoption.
Both parents want a kid, no problem, they get down to the job of being parents.
Mom doesn't want a kid, Dad does. Mom can get an abortion or give the kid up for adoption without any recourse for Dad.
Dad doesn't want a kid, Mom does. Mom carries to term and gets The State to take money away from him. Again, Dad has little to no recourse if his genes match the kid's.
Since Mom gets to make the decision about having a kid, I don't see how any father is responsible unless he volunteers for the job.
No rights = No responsibilities.
Worse, Mom can completely eliminate Dad from the raising of the children while simultaneously demanding child support. He gets no visitation, no say in how they are raised or educated. He's just financially responsible.
So, girls, if you want men to assume duties, you have to give them rights.
It should be our bodies, our choices.
And, although it's a staid position, maybe consider aspirin held between the knees for birth control until you're in a loving, lasting relationship where the kids will have two parents who agree on it.
PS: Before you comment, this is not the place to have a debate about the morality of abortion. If you try, your comment gets deleted and I will call you a mouthbreathing Walz.
Dun dun dun!
Legally, that's a machine gun and if you didn't spend $200 and get one made, and registered, before May 19, 1986; you're breaking the law.
So...
DO NOT DO THIS AT HOME IN THE REAL WORLD!
But we're talking about GURPS and Twilight: 2000 where the government has, largely, collapsed and even where it hasn't little to no effort is given to gun control.
To make one you need Armoury/TL7 (Small Arms). A successful roll gets you one that converts most semi-auto AR-15's to full-auto only. Change Rof from 3 to 13!. Also change malf to 16.
A critical success means you don't have to change the malf.
You can also eliminate the malf penalty by fitting the link to the gun, Armoury/TL7 (Small Arms) -5, or by spending the extra time during manufacture to create a fine (reliable) version.
$50, neg. for Malf 16 version.
$100, neg. for Malf 17 version.
$250, neg. no Malf version.
DO NOT DO THIS AT HOME!
"If you look at my characters, you will find me. No matter what kind of character you create or assume, a little of yourself must remain there."
-Jack Kirby
I've only made characters for role playing games and some amateur science fiction, but it's true. You put yourself in your creations and there's always a little reflection that someone might spot.
I watched a few of the training films that are out there on YouTube for WW2 aircraft showing how to start the engine.
I don't know why I'm surprised that everything I did to start my car in winter in Iowa before computers ran everything is stuff you do when cold starting a P-47.
The big difference is there's no spring returning the throttle to idle and the throttle is hand controlled not foot. Oh, and an airplane has manual mixture control.
Otherwise, just your standard 4-stroke gas engine.
But it is kinda funny watching the instructor wiggling the throttle lever to "feather it" like I would tickle the pedal to get it to catch when it hasn't quite started.
It still kind of surprises me how fast and easy the knife's opener is.
While thinking about Twilight: 2000, I came up with a really good campaign idea for once things return stateside.
Now I cannot recall what I'd come up with.
I don't even have the excuse of not having a place to have recorded it because I was typing out shit for the equipment list.
Most times, these ideas come back.
Top row, L to R: Pyrite, Amethyst, Flourite.
Bottom row, L to R: Watermelon Tourmaline, Rhodochrosite, Tangerine Quartz
Remarkably complex and difficult builds.
Modular weapons are a pain to express clearly in GURPS.
A flat top AR has no rear sight.
What's the Acc of a rifle without a rear sight?
I have decided that it's 0.
A rear sight also adds weight to the rifle, so I've shown it without the weight of a rear sight and a note on the weapons table, "Acc 0 without rear sight or optic. No iron sights while an optic is mounted."
Then I listed the detachable carry handle on the table, and a common, issue, optic.
Clear and succinct.
It's important, I've found to be so because you need to waterboard most players before they read the descriptions.
I would have mentioned the anniversary end of Prohibition 92 years ago on Friday, but I was busy drinking.
Today is Pearl Harbor Day.
84 years since The Empire of Japan opened hostilities against the US and touched the boats.
NEVER.
TOUCH.
THE.
BOATS!
Cue the Beatles... Abbey Road, side 2, song 1.
It's an OK summation of the entire InRange saga.
In one of my nexus worlds I had a barbeque place called The Tall Hog.
It was popular with the Orc and Goblinoid crowd.
Because of this, it was also a "rough" place.
I don't recall any player character trying it out.
The Tall Hog specialized in serving people meat, it's a play on long pig.
Because the nexus was pure Barter Town, there were very few rules, but you could be assured that the "livestock" was not murdered in the nexus itself. I didn't go into how they sourced their meat.
I had not actually decided!
But I found a note today that suggested that they were serving pork and it was all false advertising!
But I still regret never being able to do the scene where the players have figured out that Soylent Green IS People and the "Try The GIANT Burger" sign doesn't mean a bigger burger.
This is the same nexus where I had a seafood place where the owner/proprietor/entire staff was a group mind of, what looked to be, Christmas Island red crabs.
It had a diving board above the cook-pot and an individual crab would make a great show of diving in to be cooked and served.
108 years ago Finland decided to stop being part of Russia and declined it's first invitation to be part of the Soviet Union.
Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa has passed to the actors home in the sky.
His career had some surprising turns for me.
The G41 was a program that West Germany launched when the G11 program was showing all the signs of being an epic failure.
It's basically an HK33 that uses a normal STANAG magazine.
In the real world the end of the cold war killed the G11 project and German reunification delayed adoption of a 5.56 rifle for a few years; culminating in the G36.
In T2K, the G11's problems were solved, but it was still expensive, so the G41 was adopted as a secondary standard.
I'm having trouble finding the introduction dates for the folding backup iron sights the military issues.
I am thinking I will have to revise my T2K list, again, and make the detachable carry handle the default BUIS.
This is not to say that such sights weren't available, they just weren't issued.
I think that ARMS #40 was around in time for Twilight, but I am not certain.
Who offers the M16EZ to local governments?
I think the original game got it upside down.
But it depends on who controls the depots and the surplus.
If MilGov is offering worn parts as a kit to help local governments obtain fighting arms, that implies that CivGov controls the warehouses and depots where, literal, mountains of surplus small arms are stored.
I am thinking, in the T2K universe, that because The Cold War kept going, politics in the USA didn't go the same as our timeline. That means no Kap'n Krunch destroying mountains of M16A1's which makes them available to hand out as government aid.
That makes me wonder if the M16EZ or LMR projects are needed unless MilGov doesn't have access to the depots where the M16A1's are stored.
The LMR is a fun gun for a player to end up with.
The big question is if the LMR barrels for T2K are 1:12 or 1:7?
Something I just noticed from Forgotten Weapons posting of the LMR's manual is that it takes the M14 rifle's M6 bayonet not the M16's M7 (or M9 or OKW 3S)!
You find yourself in Poland, near Kalisz, in the year 2000 and your commander has just said, "Good luck, you're on your own," just before a big explosion takes out the TOC...
After a few days of dodging Soviets and marauders you decide you're fed up with the 3-round burst mode of your M4.
You remember your dad talking about how they got authorization, during the Gulf War to "bend" something in the fire control parts that disabled the burst and allowing full-auto fire.
What are you going to bend?
Well, dad doesn't know the whole story.
The fast way to remove the burst mode is to remove the burst interrupter, but that will let the normal interrupter to slide too far left to right in the trough in the trigger, giving a Malf of 16 in full auto fire.
Inserting a spacer the same thickness as the burst interrupter solves this issue.
If you're never going to put the 3-round back in, you can use the burst interrupter as the spacer by simply filing off both hooks.
Knowing this and doing this is Armoury/TL8 (Small Arms). If you don't have this skill, the default is Engineering/TL8 (Small Arms) -5 or Guns/TL8 (Rifle) -5.
But there's another way!
If there's an M16, M16A1, M4A1, C7, C8, C8A1, or L119A1 laying around that's deadlined for some reason besides the fire control group; you swap all the trigger and hammer parts between them and et voila!
This will give a +3 to your Armoury/TL8 (Small Arms) roll because it's so much simpler.
Please note that none of this will change a semi-automatic civilian version of an AR to a select fire weapon.
For that you need to do some drilling (and machining with some lower receivers). That's an Armoury/TL8 (Small Arms) roll at -2 because of the precision required in modifying the lower receiver. Then you toss the semi-auto hammer-trigger-sear parts and plop in the full-auto or burst parts.
Even if you make a drop-in auto-sear with an Armoury/TL8 (Small Arms) you're still going to need the full-auto or burst parts.
Changing semi-auto parts into full auto parts requires adding material to the parts and some finesse. Armoury/TL8 (Small Arms) -5 and appropriate tools are required.
Neutering full auto parts to delete select fire is Armoury/TL8 (Small Arms) +5.
Doing all of this legally... If you already own a legally registered machine gun, you can swap parts to your heart's content.
If you don't have a legally owned machinegun, the police will want to have a chat and you will be booking a room in one of the worst hotels on the planet for an extended stay.
In the world of Twilight: 2000, all bets are off! There's a slim chance of coming back under control of the chain of command who will object to modifications you've made to your issued weapon.
Canada, when they changed to 5.56 NATO from 7.62 NATO in 1984 followed the US' lead and went with an M16 variant.
The C7 is very much like the M16A2 except they kept the rear sight and full-auto from the M16A1.
Also, like the United States, in 1994 they adopted a carbine version of their rifle.
The fixed rear sight C8 and the flat-top C8A1. The C8A1 got issued with an Elcan C79 3.4x optic.
Interestingly, the flat-top C7A1 rifle wasn't issued until 2005! Too late for T2K.
I've made amendments... again.
While the M4 carbine is the official service rifle for the US Army in Twilight: 2000 as well as the real world...
The M4 RAS doesn't happen in time and the SOCOM barrel is not standard.
Stats for this are easy because High Tech lists it in this original configuration.
The GURPS stats include the detachable carry handle... 7.3 lb. as listed. But the Army went with the Matech rear sight, which is lighter. 7 lb. with oval handguards, BUIS and no optics.
The listed weight for the M16A4 is all wrong though.
Without the M5 RAS handguards and with A2 handguards and a detachable carry handle it should come to 8.8 lb. With the Matech sight, 8.5 lb., with the KAC 600m sight, 8.4 lb.
While not period correct for Twilight: 2000, an M16A4 with the M5 RAS, detachable handle, some grip panels and vertical grip, 9.6 lb. With Matech rear sight, 9.3 lb. With KAC 600m rear sight 9.2 lb.
They even get the M16A2 weights wrong with the oft-quoted 8.9 lb. I get 8.4 lb.
All fixed now!
All weights include a bog standard, green follower, gray aluminum body USGI 30-round magazine, because Magpul isn't around for T2K.
Grady Judd gives the best press conferences.
I went to vote for the Gundie Awards and encountered a problem:
Fuck that.
I already delete about 200 emails from places I've done business with already and I don't want more.
Never mind the idea that there's terms and conditions to an internet popularity contest that's binding on the voters. Even more "fun" is the terms and conditions has links to the subsections with their own terms and conditions. You have to click to three levels on one to get the whole thing you're agreeing to.
Since I've made him a character in my scribbles, I've been reading about George Crook.
In particular the battle of the Rosebud.
This is where General Crook learned that the northern plains Indians fought a little differently from the Apache and Northwest Indians he'd been accustomed to.
But part of that difference was from a change in how the Sioux and Cheyenne were dealing with Whites.
They'd gotten new leaders who were aggressive, take-the-fight-to-the-enemy types.
And they took the fight to Crook at Rosebud creek.
I've read several accounts of that fight and the worst I can call it for Crook is a draw.
The outcome of the battle was not decisive for either side, but it did fix Crook in one spot for
Both sides apparently fought until ammunition levels were getting critical and the Sioux withdrew. Crook then sent riders to his supply dump and withdrew to a better position until fresh supplies arrived.
Those supplies did not arrive until after Col. Custer had met his fate.
Something I've not seen mentioned is I think the Indians had something of an after action review of the Rosebud battle and did a "this worked, this didn't" kind of analysis and applied it to the Battle of the Greasy Grass.
I think some historians forget that Indians are people too and capable of learning and changing their approaches to problems.
I also think a lot of historians keep missing that Rosebud and Little Big Horn are separated by about a week and how long it takes to move a supplies when it's carried by wagon or mule (or how far a wagon or mule can go in a day).
Someone mentioned that the pros study logistics, some obscure general I think.
I have also noticed that George Crook was an unpopular officer with his contemporaries who really only kept his job by being relentlessly successful... Until Rosebud.
There's a lot to unpack about the man, but history is written from what people wrote about someone and those someones hate you...
Since I have T2K on the brain, I was wondering if it was better to take an M4 or and M16A4.
Both guns are different from the present day's versions.
No RAS on either.
Both accept the same optics.
The M4 will have the earlier lighter barrel.
The M4 loses a bit of damage vs the A4. 4d+2 pi vs 5d pi. That's 4-26 avg 16 against 5-30 avg 17.5.
The M4 loses some reach. 750/2,900 vs 800/3,500.
The M4 is lighter. 7.3 lb. vs 8.9 lb.
The M4 has less Bulk. 4 vs 5.
The M4 costs more. $950 vs $850.
So the M4 does 91% the average damage per shot at 94%/83% the range for 82% the mass for 80% the bulk for 112% the money.
Looks like the M4 wins the min/max fight with the M16A4.